January 16, 2008
outside- Distance 4.00 miles
- Time 00:35:00
- Average Speed 6.86 mph
- Average Pace 8:45 min/mile
I'm pathetically consistent! In time and distance that is.
Nice night - I need a trick though for not forming icicles on my eyelashes ... it gets to be a lot sometimes and makes it hard to see/stay awake.
Too warmly dressed, again, again, again!
Comments
see awake? stay awake?
How about some mittens that let you wipe your eyes off?
Read the Times article I sent about dressing properly.
And pathetically consistent is just fine. As I recall, you weren't ever so interested in getting better faster stronger. But it is possible....
doesn't the / refer to the aformentioned? "hard to" see/hard to stay awake? Come on Schneider, I thought you were an English buff. No, really, let me know what proper format is because I lika da /.
Jessica, how do you fall asleep running? Wish I could go into sleep mode and crack off a few miles.
No, I gotcha Chris. Makes sense. I read it wrong. Jessica will clear this all up in a moment.
Ok, word is: in this case / is separating the words associated with "hard to" ("see" and "stay awake"). Chris is right. I appreciate the vigilance, Greg - better luck next time. I don't really know proper use of the / but there you go, that's what. Feel free to cite me as a source on that if you run into the law someday.
I still don't hear a fantastic solution to my prob other than The Mittens Solution, which has been tried and failed. I haven't tried *very* absorbent mittens though - like terry mittens perhaps? Hm, something to work on.
And Chris: you don't nod off midrun? It's refreshing - try it!
sweet vindication!
I think I have the answer to your eyecicle problem: www.skigogglesoverglasses.com
I think the 'windshield' or 'big ben' style would be right up your alley...sure to intimidate any small children that don't vacate your path. Greg: I'm thinking about some of these for biking.
This all gets back to Chris and my attempt to communicate via punctuation alone. Jessica could have eliminated the grammatical problem by simply using "and". Though perhaps not as efficient in the moment, clearly efficient in the long run.
Add Comment